I asked Grok to analyze this comment from a guy who hosts a podcast on evangelism and also wrote a book called, “Proof God Is Real.” So…a person who professes to teach. Here’s the critique from AI:

• Ad Hominem Attack: The statement labels the critic as an “unloving critic” and part of a “long line of heretic hunters” without engaging with the substance of their criticisms. This personal attack sidesteps the validity of the critique and assumes the critic’s motives are malicious.
• Generalization: It broadly claims that “most charismatics will oppose you” and “we have heard it all before,” without evidence or specificity. This dismisses potential new or valid critiques and assumes a monolithic response from charismatics, ignoring diversity within the movement.
• False Dichotomy: The statement pits a “move of God” against criticism of “flawed but passionate leaders,” implying that accountability and spiritual revival are mutually exclusive. This oversimplifies the issue, as valid critique could align with a desire for genuine spiritual renewal.
• Emotional Appeal Over Reason: The statement prioritizes passion and desire for a “move of God” over addressing the critic’s points. It appeals to emotions (“tired of being hunted,” “flawed but passionate”) rather than engaging rationally with potential issues in leadership or theology.
• Lack of Specificity: It vaguely references “some validity” in criticisms but doesn’t clarify what those might be or how they could be addressed. This avoids constructive dialogue about accountability or reform within the charismatic movement.
• Defensiveness: The tone is defensive, framing criticism as an “attack” rather than an opportunity for reflection or growth. This shuts down potential for self-examination or addressing legitimate concerns about leadership flaws.
• Unsubstantiated Assumptions: It assumes the critic lacks love and that their intent is to hunt heretics, without evidence of their motives or character. This risks misrepresenting the critic’s position or purpose.

“In summary, the statement’s weaknesses lie in its reliance on emotional rhetoric, personal attacks, and generalizations, which hinder constructive engagement with criticism and sidestep accountability.” — Grok (an unfeeling, dispassionate, heartless, robot).

If you believe your love for Jesus automatically justifies everything you say, you are mistaken. Heretic hunters love Jesus too. The only people who need to fear heretic hunters are heretics.

(Proverbs 18:13) He who answers before listening— that is his folly and his shame.