It is not a sign of intellectual progress to put the word “biological” in front of “male” or “female.” We have given control of our language to a teensy-weensy group of irrational bullies.

Years ago, before we put crazy people in charge, parents dressed tiny babies in pink or blue depending on their gender. They did this because it is difficult to tell baby girls from baby boys by looking at their faces. The clothing color was a courtesy that saved the rest of us from asking the awkward question about gender. Even when the baby was decked out in a pink dress, pink bloomers, pink booties and sported a lacey pink headband, unobservant people would still ask, “Boy or girl?”

That question NEVER caused parents to ponder whether or not they had dressed their child appropriately. There was no anxiety or uncertainty. Nobody ever gave the panicked answer, “We’re not sure!” They would graciously smile and say, “She’s a girl.” And the vast majority of parents still answer this question with confidence. But now, the irrational bullies are calling those parents abusive.

The tiny group of depraved narcissists have successfully convinced us that gender has nothing to do with biology. They insist that gender is a ‘social construct’ and people can decide for themselves what it means to be “male or female.” That’s why we are now shoving the word ‘biological’ in front of gender specific words like ‘boy,’ ‘girl,’ ‘man,’ or ‘woman.’

Have you noticed that the ‘social construct’ is only applied to people? The tiny group of irrational, depraved, narcissistic bullies don’t reference biology when talking about their pets. Actually, that may not be true. It’s a safe bet that there are pet owners who will tell you their ‘biological female’ Poodle is really a male. The poodle won’t deny it so it must be true.

But I’m certain that the ‘social construct’ isn’t applied to biological plant life. Nobody says a bowl of fruit contains ‘biological apples’ or ‘biological grapes.’ You will never hear the insane, angry, selfish, depraved, social warriors identify a vegetable as a ‘biological chickpea.’ Do you know why?

Because that is so obviously stupid that even THEY can’t pretend it’s correct.

The term ‘biological male’ is just as stupid as ‘biological cumquat.’ It is a redundancy that is only used by crazy people. Saying ‘male’ or ‘female’ will sufficiently communicate gender to sane people. It’s time to quit using the language of the insane.

“See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ.”

(Colossians 2:8)