There’s nothing more offensive than the truth.
I had a conversation on another blog on the topic of Michael Jackson. (Here’s the link.)
What I thought was an innocent statement proved quite intolerable to a Pink Agendist.
ME: I think you’re correct. Pedos are monsters, for now. In the not too distant future, pedophilia will enjoy the same protected status as homosexuality and trans-genderism. You will be the monster for suggesting there is something wrong with sleeping with children. The culture will always find a target for their moral outrage in the Christian church. 
Pink: Trouble understanding the concept of consent?
ME: As a matter of fact, yes. The concept of consent is very troubling.
Whatever people decide to do is morally acceptable as long as they agree and are past an arbitrary age. If you don’t think the age of consent is going to be the next archaic idea to come tumbling down, you’re naive.
Pink: An arbitrary age? You don’t think there’s a reasonable way of establishing an age over which people can engage in certain activities?
ME: No. I don’t.
Parents are telling me their children can determine their own genders before they’re 5 years old. If a child can make that decision, surely it’s capable of giving consent.
Pink: How do you think Christians determined marital age throughout history?
ME: Arbitrarily.
Pink: Arbitrary means random, or without a basis in a reasonable/rational system. In the case of an age of consent, there’s a very well thought through system in place. It weighs the rights of the individual against the rights of other citizens (including family) and sets a general standard. That’s not arbitrary as it takes into account the circumstances of the time.
ME: Arbitrary does not mean “random” or “without a basis in reason”. Arbitrary means “Based on or subject to individual discretion or preference”.
The “well thought through system” to which you refer exists only in religion. There is no such system in secular culture.
Pink: I found Branyan’s comments fascinating. Notice how he’s not really interested in any of the topics we’re discussing. Everything he says is aimed at confirming tribal membership or tribal validation in itself.
The Ultimate Compliment
Pink eventually decided that my hateful propaganda had to be exposed.
Pink: My opposition to pedophilia is based on ethics, and the law – namely that a child is incapable of consent. A child cannot consent to enter into any contracts, or to engage in activities deemed too complex, dangerous or with legal ramifications/liability. I made that very clear. You, on the other hand seem to think the rape of children can be equated to adult consensual legal relationships, so it’s quite clear where you stand. I hope authorities in your area know it too. And if they don’t you can be sure I’ll make sure they do shortly. People like you who make light of child rape are an active danger to society.
He created an entire blog dedicated to sounding the alarm. (Here’s the link.)
I’m flattered that my rhetoric was important enough to warrant this much attention from a guy who told me he wouldn’t “waste his time” reading my blog.
As of this writing, there’s only one screen shot on display but I’m confident Pink will be posting more because he cares deeply about protecting you from my toxicity.
I don’t recommend commenting on Pink’s blog because he has demonstrated he is untrustworthy with open dialogue. (He censors comments.)
If you want to speak without fear of censorship, you’ll need to do that here.
As always, I am willing to clarify or defend any of my statements that you see fit to challenge.
…feel free to contact the local authorities and alert them as well.
7 Responses
I just found this brief abstract from National Institutes of Health that I thought might be of interest:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756
You know, as we continue our cultural regression back to outright paganism and utter chaos, pedophile’s rights are not stretch at all to imagine in the future. It’s not even unprecedented in history. In ancient cultures like Greece, pederasty was the societal norm (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athenian_pederasty). And from a purely pagan standpoint, there is no rationale to say that pedophilia is immoral. None whatsoever. One must borrow from religion in order to make this assumption.
So, your pink friend is very naive if he thinks it can’t happen. Not to mention, hypocritical, as you pointed out, since we’re already talking about letting children pick their own gender. This is what you get when you remove the very thing that created our cultural morals and then expect no slippery slope when the whole foundation upon which it was laid crumbles. Nietzsche saw this coming and warned us about it. It what happens when people give up God (transcendent values) and descend into the bottomless pit of nihilism.
I always appreciate your comments, Mel!
The atheists like to cherry-pick moral guidelines. They’re on board with “Thou shalt not murder” but they don’t care for “Thou shalt have no other gods before me”. It’s kind of funny when a homosexual lectures me about the evils of pedophilia as if I’m the one advocating sexual anarchy.
Thanks for creating a space where we can talk freely! Now that I’m not worried about comments being manipulated (and screenshots cutting only part of a conversation), I can start promoting this exchange again.
i’d happily send it to all of your comedian friends! Parts of this are tragic…but it’s also pretty funny.
You aren’t worried that the CCA is gonna throw me out for my hate-filled rhetoric?
I’m worried they’re going to hurt themselves laughing.