If you’re going to be a selfish, evil, slayer-of-children then be consistent.
Stop using words like “baby”, “kid”, “son”, “daughter”, and “child” to refer to your reproductive choices.
Pro-Choice is about YOU!
It’s confusing when you celebrate “babies” after completing nine months of pregnancy.
You’re sending mixed messages when you post pictures online.
So I’m gonna help you out!
Here are some examples of how pro-choice people should caption pictures:*
The Pro-Choice Fetal Development Picture Album
A couple of the reproductive choices in their PJs.
Me with the decision that I made after consulting with my doctor.
All the sacrifices I’ve made and this reproductive choice doesn’t look grateful. LOL!
Hard to believe it’s been one year since I carried this embryo to term.Â
My choice wanted to catch turtles but I put a stop to that! Animals have rights! I told it, “Being human doesn’t make you special.”
Watching the product of conception run around in the yard reminds me I’m a great person for allowing it to live.
This private decision isn’t bugging me today. It must have heard me talking about foster care! LOL!
When you first glance at it, this reproductive choice almost looks human! LOL!
Pro-Choice folks should use consistent terminology.
Pro-Life words should be reserved for human conversation.
Â
5 Responses
Oh, ouch Branyan! I suppose you’ve made your point quite well and those babies certainly are adorable.
So if I am having a long conversation with a meaningless clump of cells that sprung forth from nothingness and I find them inconvenient, is there some moral reason why I cannot just annihilate them? I jest, I’m relatively harmless, but seriously, I’ve never been able to find a satisfactory answer beyond people are made in the image of God?
I concur.
My issue is with the hypocrisy of referring to certain clumps of cells as “babies” just because they’ve passed through the birth canal.
So if you blow up a Planned Parenthood office and everyone inside, CNN should report that you chose “post- natal, extra- uteran abortions”, and stop hypocritically calling it “murder”. After all, “murder” is when a human chooses to kill an ape, dolphin, or something cute like a rabbit.
I’m sure CNN will start referring to terrorist killings as “expression of religious conviction” while, as your many atheist readers have already expressed, Christians refusing to bake gay wedding cakes will be labeled as terrorism.
But what do you call it when an Islamic terrorist kills a woman who was pregnant with a gay baby that she didn’t want?
I’m going to leave that to the experts on the internet.
One of the experts told me, emphatically, the government cannot and should not force a woman to carry a baby to term when she does not want it.
I asked the guy why the government should force a woman to feed a 7-year-old that she doesn’t want…he hasn’t gotten back with me yet.
Comment of the year, Brian. 🙂
I’m wrestling with a similar question: “What happens when an adult with several disabilities has some sort of awkward sexual encounter according to a former woman who now says it was assault?”
Mental illness or female using the hashtag #MeToo?? I really don’t know the rules well enough to make the call.