It’s almost 10 minutes long.

It requires an EXTREMELY high threshold for awkward to view the whole thing.

I don’t want to make this about politics, Fox News, Newsweek or Donald Trump.

Let’s make it personal.

Let’s make it about YOU.

Have you ever been Eichenwald?

Be honest.

Have you ever said something you regretted…

…and refused to admit it?

Nobody likes to be wrong.

NOBODY.

Yet…

…reasonable people know that ‘wrong’ is unavoidable.

When I say you’re going to be wrong sometimes…

…I’m right.

To be wrong is to be human.

Own your mistakes.

Acknowledge your blunders.

Laugh at yourself.

Watch the video again…

Did Eichenwald earn your respect?

Did refusing to answer the question make him more credible in your opinion?

Care to guess what happens when you act like Eichenwald?

Yeah.

That’s right.

Christian Comedy for Hire

If you like my blog even a little bit, then you should know I do Christian Comedy live shows! It’s all the faith and fun you read here, but on stage, it’s even more hilarious. Hire me for your next corporate bash, church event, or school function, and let’s make it a night of laughs with my unique brand of Christian Comedy!

three little pigs

Three Little Pigs

Three Little Pigs in Shakespeare is available as a children’s book. Get the illustrated story based on my viral comedy routine from Amazon.  Makes a great gift for the word-lovers in your life. 

You gonna keep lurking forever or are you gonna join this exclusive clique?
Stop procrastinating. Click This.

Leave a comment

70 Responses

  1. Pingback: Highlight Reel, 2016 – The Comedy Sojourn
  2. @Senor Dipshit.

    The fact that you continue to allude to some vie trait because of occasionally photographing kids while doing Street Photography, in all likelihood, not only impugns every other individual who enjoys Street Photographer, but aptly demonstrates your sick predilection and your futile attempts to get a rise.

    In all seriousness, mate, your behavior in this regard is something any normal person reading this thread will likely be concerned about.
    I recommend, before the hole you’re digging gets any deeper. you might consider toning it down, acknowledge you are simply taking the piss, or, if you are being serious, then seek help.
    You are winning no friends with this line I can assure you, and the average christian would simply consider you to be disgusting.

    And I mean that in all sincerity.

    In the secular world – Doug is a bigot for not excepting the diversity of the ISIS culture. His bigotry is based on his subjective feelings only – nothing solid – nothing external – nothing universally true.

    I accept pretty much most cultures that I am aware of, providing they do not forcibly impinge on me and my family or hurt or damage people or animals

    ISIS does.
    And in many cases, so does Christianity. Certainly the fundamentalist variety.

    Doug fulfills prophecy and proves Christ …

    There never was any such individual named ”Christ”.
    Yeshua, quite possibly.

    1. @occasional hidden street photographer of school kids –

      What? Was it something I said? It doesn’t feel good to be told that you may be dangerous to children? Weird.

      How many times have you told Amanda that she is dangerous to her own children? You regularly impugn Christians as being dangerous to children (including in this comment section).

      I’m simply returning the favor.

      You’re a bully that gets a rise out of every Christian blog you comment on. And you are obviously a coward (as are all bullies) that is unable to take what you dish out. And when questions are posed to you that you cannot readily answer – you become unhinged (perhaps deep seeded anger issues that professional psycho analysis can remedy). Pathetic. Weak. Sad.

      All that being said – I continue to pray for you regularly.

      ~

      1. Ah, and when you are called out you have to resort to lying once again.

        I have said it before and will say it again.
        You behavior suggests you are in need of professional help.

        If you wish to serve as an example to your faith then defend it rather than continuously lie.
        Surely, you should be clued up enough to run circles around the average non believer, so why don’t you?

        Why do you not know and understand your religion inside out and backwards?
        Why do you not have answers to every archaeological query?

        In truth, you know the answer.

        It is because you have no evidence to backs anything you assert regarding you faith. Not a thing..

        Amanda contemplated offing herself with a gun – so she claimed – because she believed life was pointless. (paraphrasing)
        She wrote about it.
        Ask her yourself for a more accurate rendition.
        Being under such a cloud of depression/mental instability with young kids around and having access to a firearm is not a good combination.
        She also admires a man like David Wood, a psycho who bludgeoned his father with a hammer.

        Just for your own edification, try a quick Google search to see how many religious nut jobs have offed their kids.

        Coward? Not in the least.
        If you want to lie that is your prerogative.
        It just makes you look like a dick, that’s all.

        I comment on certain religious blogs because of the lies the hosts peddle.

        I first encountered Branyan on John Zande’s Blog.

        It didn’t take him long to show his true colours, and very little has changed since then.
        He comes across as a highly insecure fundamentalist and conveys the impression he believes he is doing Christianity a big favour by writing posts that often denigrate non believers, I suspect, because he knows he has no other ammo.

        Many fundamentalists I have encountered operate in a similar vein.

        The christian religion is founded on lies and the entire premise is all about bullying.

        This is why you truly believe you will go to hell ( whatever version you hold in your heart) if you do not believe the divinity of the biblical character,. Jesus of Nazareth.

        Believe whatever you like. Truly. I do not care one iota.
        Just extend the same respect to children, especially your own.

      2. @Secret Child Photographer

        You once stated, “Morality is built upon reciprocity, thus if you are nice it is generally likely that any normal person will be nice in return.”

        Later in that same thread you had your meltdown and coined the name Senor Dipshit (without the tilde). Again – I wear it as a badge of honor.

        That badge is a beautiful reminder for when the comedian, the depressed stay at home mom, and little old me stumped you with a simple yes or no question that took you over three months to research and answer.

        Yes – you’re a coward. You’ve proven that in this thread and many others that you simply cannot take what you dish out.

        Pathetic. Weak. Sad. Doug. (Again – in the voice of Jacob Marley)

        Last word belongs to you if you dare.

        ~

  3. Doug has plenty of proof to believe. His problem is not intellectual. His problem is rebellion and pride.

    Branyan you are priceless.
    The garbage that effuses forth from your indoctrinated mouth is enough to make any normal person cringe.

    If there was any truth to anything you prattle on about then more than half the world would be in the same boat as you claim I am in.

    Furthermore, a huge number of believers in your own particular god feel the same about your worldview as many non-Christians.

    Many must cringe as I do,over your incessant ridiculous blatherings and indeed, as you probably do when an ignoramus such as Ken Ham, claims to be a True Believer opens his mouth and tries to indoctrinate kids and adults alike regarding Noah’s flood and other bullsquirt,

    There is no verifiable evidence for a single thing pertaining to your faith.
    Not. A. Thing.

    And this is the most cited reason have read from christian deconverts and from those of other faiths whom I have also read.

    Seriously, take some time off and do some serious study of your religion from non religious professionals.

    1. mrsmcmommy,

      Always nice to get a refocus on the topic at hand.

      I will recite the TOAL to myself daily as a reminder of John’s blog wisdom, which you so nicely condensed.

      Dave

      Proverbs 19:20 (ESV) – Listen to advice and accept instruction, that you may gain wisdom in the future.

  4. @Branyan

    Thanks, Dave.
    Here’s another scripture that popped into my head after reading our friend’s predictable reply.

    1 Corinthians 1:18

    Except, like so mush about your silly religion, you are unable to fully explain this.

    1. Do you attack because you truly want proof, or do you attack because you hate God and would still reject Him if the proof were incontrovertible?

      Dave

      Revelation 20:11- 15 (ESV) – Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. From his presence earth and sky fled away, and no place was found for them. And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Then another book was opened, which is the book of life. And the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to what they had done. And the sea gave up the dead who were in it, Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them, and they were judged, each one of them, according to what they had done. Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

      1. I challenge because you insist upon veracity without providing a single scrap of verifiable evidence to back such claims.
        As an adult, you are free to believe what you like, of course.
        That you insist on acting on this belief; evangelizing for one and specially to vulnerable children is, in my view, and the view of a great many people, tantamount to abuse.

        I do not hate your god or any god, for that matter.
        To hate a work of fiction as if it were real suggests one is suffering some sort of delusion.Very much in a similar vein as a believer.

        On occasion, however, I loath the actions carried out by people based upon their interpretation of such farcical, erroneous text.
        ISIS as a perfect example.

        Or, if you prefer a more recent Christian example, George Bush claiming Yahweh spoke to him prior to him going to war.

        I could also cite the numerous example of Christians who have butchered their children or other family because they claimed ”God instructed them”.

        Your continual quoting of scripture to an atheist merely demonstrates the level of ignorance on display and more than adequately proves my point.

      2. Dave: 1 Cor. 1:18

        Doug has plenty of proof to believe. His problem is not intellectual. His problem is rebellion and pride.

        The Bible will do nothing to persuade anyone who isn’t open to persuasion. You are as likely to convert Doug to faith as he is to convert you to atheism.

        Notice his use of the word, “challenge”. He believes he has raised salient points of argument. He believes he is on solid philosophical ground. He’s a fundamentalist. Totally unaware of his foolishness. DOUG could easily take the place of Tucker’s guest in the video.

        Some recommended reading is C.S. Lewis’ ‘Great Divorce’. Doug is practicing his eternal mantra. A stubborn, anguished cry of outrage that will echo unheard by anyone save himself.

        1. “Hell is a state of mind… And every state of mind, left to itself–every shutting up of the creature within the dungeon of its own mind–is, in the end, Hell…”

      3. “ISIS (is) a perfect example” … of what Doug cannot prove is wrong with science. Science fails to prove moral “oughtness.”

        In the secular world – Doug is a bigot for not excepting the diversity of the ISIS culture. His bigotry is based on his subjective feelings only – nothing solid – nothing external – nothing universally true.

        As a side note, sneaking around taking photographs of schoolchildren can also be seen as tantamount to abuse.

        Dave – We (the gang) truly admire, enjoy, agree with, and believe your comments. You are a testament to the faith.

        I, on the other hand, am what I have long referred to as a lifelong Disciple In Progress – or DIP for short. Which, ironically, makes it even funnier to me when Doug calls me Senor DIPshit (which should be “Señor” hence my use of “~” in front of CQW as a nod to Doug). I wear his (and his ilk’s) hatred as a badge of honor.

        ~CQW

        Btw – Doug fulfills prophecy and proves Christ …

        John 15:18-25

        “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. Remember what I told you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’[a] If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the one who sent me. If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not be guilty of sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin. Whoever hates me hates my Father as well. If I had not done among them the works no one else did, they would not be guilty of sin. As it is, they have seen, and yet they have hated both me and my Father. But this is to fulfill what is written in their Law: ‘They hated me without reason.’

      1. CQW –

        I explained the gospel to Zoomer Chimp awhile back and it converted to Christianity. Any theories as to why Doug can’t grasp what is obvious to even a brainless plastic baboon?

  5. I’m sorry that science can’t prove genocide is wrong. You’ve really let me down. And that hurts.

    ~CQW

    Maybe your psychiatrist will be able to tell you an answer you will be happy with?
    If he/she does, please let me know the answer.

    1. I can read between the lines. You obviously want us to go to couples therapy. BUTT again, I shall pass.

      Stop flirting.

      Creeeeeeeeepy.

      1. As surprised as I am that you are flaunting your homosexual tendencies on a fundamentalist blog, especially as you are an indoctrinated fundamentalist yourself, I think it best you rather take your established partner to therapy. At least he will be familiar with your particular issues, whereas I have no leanings in this direction.

  6. @Senor Dipshit.

    Tell me, is your penchant for such perversity, which for some reason compels you to behave in such a disturbing manner,
    because of your adherence to the misguided belief in the divine nature of a narrative construct, Jesus of Nazareth, and his equally make- believe sky daddy, Yahweh, being your key to eternal life, so you simply don’t give a shit?

    1. Ark McChitty Chatterson –

      As Boy George would say …

      Do you really want to hurt me?

      Do you really want to make me cry?

      Do you really want to hurt me?

      Do you really want to make me cry?

  7. “Senor Dipshit

    Understood Douglas-do-right. If you murder the best hunter – the rest of the tribe starves. So murder is wrong because food. That’s your three month answer. Good.

    No. Not because of food. Because of common sense. Try to learn the difference.

    In that case – killing and eating the weaker “food” within the tribe could help the strongest hunter (and his lucky lady* friend) produce the next generation. This would also allow the greatest hunter some extra free time. Eating the weak is okay.

    Some tribes have practiced cannibalism in the past. And also those survivors from the plane crash in the Andes some time back. Remember?
    Needs must and all that.

    *male hunter and lucky boyfriend would not be able to produce the next generation without the opposite sex

    This leads us back to the original question. Isn’t a murdered gay person simply unfit for survival? They can’t produce the next generation anyway.

    Are you suggesting the gay person was fit for survival before he /she was murdered?
    You really must try to phrase your question in a manner that at least conveys you understand what you are talking about.
    I suggest you write the question out several times until you get it right before posting

    So if gay people are eating the food that could provide additional sustenance to those that can produce the next generation – is it okay to murder gay people?

    Why not simply grow more food?

    And no scientific evidence to prove that genocide is wrong. That’s embarrassing.

    This was covered in the previous exchange. My answer has not changed. Did you at least make an appointment with a doctor?

    Btw – it’s creepy that you haven’t denied wanting a rectum photo to “dispell (your) notion” that I have a carrot stuck in my rectum.

    To be honest I did not think you were being serious. For the record, I think it decidedly odd that:
    a) you somehow deduced I would want a photo.
    and
    b) You have a picture/pictures at hand for distribution.

    To my mind, that is very, very creepy. Have you sent such snaps to others already?
    *Ark Shudders*
    Perhaps you ought to talk to a medical professional?

    1. For the record – you said I’d have to provide evidence to dispel your notion that I had a carrot up my rectum. What better evidence than a photograph? Ergo – this is an obvious attempt by you to garner said photo. Butt, I’ll still pass.

      I’m not suggesting anything about gays. Evolution is. But someday – Sea Centaurs! Probably within the next century.

      We can grow more food? Then the best hunter is no longer necessary to the tribe! Common sense – remember? Your three month answer smells of elderberries!

      Your complete lack of scientific proof that genocide is wrong still stands. I presupposed that was the case.

      And I knew you were okay with cannabalism.

      ~CQW

      1. Your complete lack of scientific proof that genocide is wrong still stands. I presupposed that was the case.

        Again, most normal people would consider such a request utterly absurd and likely bordering on insane, thus, my (now) strong recommendation you seek professional medical help.

        you said I’d have to provide evidence to dispel your notion that I had a carrot up my rectum. What better evidence than a photograph?

        Your sense of the literal is quite disturbing, and it still makes me wonder why you would immediately jump to the conclusion I would require a photograph , and that you would would have copies on hand?
        Do you send out such images to people on a regular basis?

        I’m not suggesting anything about gays. Evolution is.

        Yes, evolution is unequivocal about this: it happens throughout the animal kingdom.

        We can grow more food? Then the best hunter is no longer necessary to the tribe!

        Exactly! We have moved past the hunter gatherer phase. This is called evolution.
        Keep going, I really think you might just get it soon.

      2. “Do you send out such images to people on a regular basis?”

        No. You’re the only one to ever ask for such evidence. Stop backtracking. It’s embarrassing.

        “Yes, evolution is unequivocal about this: it happens throughout the animal kingdom.”

        Gay animals are already reproducing without the opposite sex? It’s happening faster than I expected. Sea centaurs within 25 years! I can’t wait to buy one for the pool.

        “Exactly! We have moved past the hunter gatherer phase.”

        Why do you hate hunters?

        I’m sorry that science can’t prove genocide is wrong. You’ve really let me down. And that hurts.

        ~CQW

        1. You’re buying a Sea centaur for the pool??!!! They haven’t fully evolved yet and you’re already enslaving them for your amusement. How typically human. Sitting atop the evolutionary pyramid oppressing the rest of the biosphere. Enlightened self interest. Awkward. Embarrassing.

      3. I’ve already named him too – Lil Doug the Sea Centaur.

        And Doug – don’t get the big head – he’s not named after you. Silly goose!

  8. @Dave
    In that case,Dave, perhaps you should kill a sheep?
    Purely from a logical point of view one can see how slaughtering a defenseless animal would atone for your sins and or/mistakes.

    1. Ah, but here is the beauty of it: Christ was the Lamb of God, the last sacrifice needed. He fulfilled the old law, so that in His once-for-all-time sacrifice, we have salvation and forgiveness of sins.

      This is why there is no need for further sacrifice.

      Dave

      And now, for your reading pleasure, Scripture that explains it precisely:

      Hebrews 10:1-18 (ESV) –

      For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near. Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, since the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have any consciousness of sins? But in these sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.

      Consequently, when Christ came into the world, he said,

      “Sacrifices and offerings you have not desired,
      but a body have you prepared for me;
      in burnt offerings and sin offerings
      you have taken no pleasure.
      Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come to do your will, O God,
      as it is written of me in the scroll of the book.’”

      When he said above, “You have neither desired nor taken pleasure in sacrifices and offerings and burnt offerings and sin offerings” (these are offered according to the law), then he added, “Behold, I have come to do your will.” He does away with the first in order to establish the second. And by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

      And every priest stands daily at his service, offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, waiting from that time until his enemies should be made a footstool for his feet. For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified.

      And the Holy Spirit also bears witness to us; for after saying,

      “This is the covenant that I will make with them
      after those days, declares the Lord:
      I will put my laws on their hearts,
      and write them on their minds,”

      then he adds,

      “I will remember their sins and their lawless deeds no more.”

      Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin.

      1. Thank you for that.
        For what it’s worth I hope you are aware that the biblical character, Jesus of Nazareth, the Lake Tiberius Pedestrian is nothing but a narrative construct.

      2. Odd isn’t it, that your religion acknowledges a blood sacrifice as some sort of goddamn atonement yet you lot are all born in sin and are likely doomed – according to your silly religion of course.

        How disgusting is your all powerful, make believe god that he simply could not say, ”S’okay.I forgive you.”

        But then, one must always remember that, Yahweh is a meglomaniacal, genocidal monster, is he not?

        What truly very silly people Christians are.

      3. Thanks, Dave.
        Here’s another scripture that popped into my head after reading our friend’s predictable reply.

        1 Corinthians 1:18

      4. (Imagine this being said by Jacob Marley)

        Douglas Stewart Pearce –

        You have failed to provide any scientific evidence that genocide is wrong.

        Failed! Failed I say!

        Morality is relative, etc., etc.

        1. Doug replies: “You are but a narrative construct, Marley! Perhaps a bit of undigested beef…”

      5. John,

        Yeah, the ! Corinthians passage does prove true.

        With some unbelievers, it is not just passive disbelief, where they shrug at the Gospel and are unaffected and go on about their lives. With some, there is an active disbelief, not only rejecting the truth, but fighting against it. Makes me think that the message is hitting a sore spot, and they are fighting against belief in God. I can’t imagine a person having such hatred in their heart for a God they do not believe in. Rather, I think they believe and reject, unwilling to submit to the will of their Maker.

        Else, why hang out in John Branyan’s Christian Comedy Sojourn blog? There is no chance that any of us posters will deny our faith based on their attacks on it. We are not fence-sitters here, we are here to talk about the topic of the blog, and most often it touches on our faith.

        I am beginning to think that they are demanding proof… because they really want it and need it to believe. That is not what God wants us to do, assuredly, but perhaps it is a way to see where the heart of the hostile unbeliever really is.

        When posed the question, “Would you believe if you had this tactile proof you demand?”, if they say they would still not believe, that is very telling. If they say, :Yes! If tangible proof were displayed to me, I would worship God instantly and believe.”, then that is telling as well.

        I wonder where the unbelievers in our virtual midst fall on that question…

        Dave

        Romans 1:18-23 (ESV) – For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.

  9. John,

    I watched the whole thing. Then I realized that this was the same guy who just said he is pursuing criminal charges against a guy who sent him a gif that he said induced an epileptic attack on him. He seems a bit unhinged.

    But to answer the query posed by the blog…

    I hate to be wrong, and I hate admitting it even more. As a teen and young adult, I would argue long past ridiculousness and only end up looking foolish. I knew I was wrong, but was grasping at anything to defend my ego.

    Why? Lack of humility. When we lack humility, we can’t allow ourselves to be seen as wrong and fallible.

    Now, in my late 40s, I still hate to be wrong, but I do admit when I am, and I admit mistakes. I am a cook, and sometimes misread a ticket or miss something in the sometimes hundreds of items I am cooking in a day. Lying, not admitting I messed up, or even worse, blaming others for my mistake would make me look like an idiot.

    So I bite the bullet and model for the young’uns I work with (one of the servers most rudely informed me that I was the same age as her father today… the nerve!) that you fess up when you mess up (ooh… I think I made that rhyme up. I refuse to Google it and find that I was not original). I have found that I am more respected when I admit I have made a mistake.

    Also, if we quickly admit we are wrong, we can beat people to the punch of pointing it out. Then it is a non-issue. My boss certainly is very forgiving when I tell him I made a mistake right away. He always says “It happens. Learn from it.”

    Dave

    Proverbs 16:18 (ESV) – Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.

      1. mrsmcmommy,

        Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

        You burst my bubble.

        I am quite sure it needed bursting, thought. Well done.

        Or should I argue that the Uppity Blues Women video is fake news? Or a Russian hack?

        Hmm.. that song *is* catchy… and stuck in my head…

        Dave

        1 Peter 5:6-7 (ESV) – Humble yourselves, therefore, under the mighty hand of God so that at the proper time he may exalt you, casting all your anxieties on him, because he cares for you.

      2. …that was supposed to say “though”, not “thought”…

        I freely admit my mistake.

        Dave

        Leviticus 5:18 (ESV) – He shall bring to the priest a ram without blemish out of the flock, or its equivalent, for a guilt offering, and the priest shall make atonement for him for the mistake that he made unintentionally, and he shall be forgiven.

  10. Here’s a tip for all of you who tend to argue online. Don’t waste your time. People rarely respond to actual questions, they almost never engage in critical thinking and polite discussion and they never change their minds about anything…ever. You might as well be trying to convince fire to cool off a while.

  11. Yes, similar to when I ask: ”And what is the name of your god?”
    Ever Christian – especially on this blog – seems very reluctant to give a direct answer to this question for some reason. Very … Eichenwald.

      1. Really? YOu truly beleive this even deserves an answer?
        Well, okay, clever clogs.
        I shall give you a direct answer on the condition you tell me the name of your god?
        Do you agree to thisa?

          1. That was rather a long and convoluted thread if I recall?
            So just to simplify …. and one I can keep for my records when I need something to smile about.
            Just tell me again;
            What is the name of the god you worship?
            ( And then I will answer the ”gays” question, you have my word.

            Fire away … name of your god, please.

          2. Yeah, as I suspected.
            You’re done with YOU Amanda., matter, dont wanna tell the nasty atheist the name of your god?
            You don’t have Jewish prohibitions against pronouncing it’s name do you?

          3. I thought you were done?

            Seems you tell porky-pies a lot.
            Scared of naming your god?
            Prob’ly don’t want to be seen to be any more ignorant than you already are, Amanda, eh?

          4. So, you’re still here.
            Trying to make a point?
            here, let me give you a helping hand and make it simple for you.
            Try this.

            Copy and paste this.
            Ark, the name of my god is :

    1. Ark –

      The name of my God in Hebrew is Yeshua “Joshua” and in Greek is Iesous “Jesus.”

      That’s four answers.

      Here’s two questions.

      1. Isn’t any murdered person (regardless of sexuality) simply unfit for survival? A “NO” answer requires explanation.

      2. Why are you so intolerant of genocide? Please provide scientific evidence that proves genocide is wrong.

      Lastly, I’m still not sending you a picture of my rectum no matter how badly you MAY want it. That’s just creepy.

      ~CQW

      1. Excellent! So you worship a fictional character from a collection of largely erroneous text.
        Thank you for your honesty, Senor Dipshit.
        At least you had the integrity to step up to the plate.

        1. Isn’t any murdered person (regardless of sexuality) simply unfit for survival? A “NO” answer requires explanation.

        No.
        Example: If your angle is purely ”Survival of the Fittest”, it is obvious you do not understand this concept based on the way you have framed your question.
        Ergo: If the strongest hunter in the tribe was murdered ( murder is usually motivated by jealousy or some other form of insecurity) then the tribe would no longer have the most viable source for procuring food, and could very likely go hungry. So, even from this perspective. one can see this would be a mistake.

        2. Why are you so intolerant of genocide? Please provide scientific evidence that proves genocide is wrong.

        Only an individual suffering from some type of mental
        disorder would even ask such a question, so the most empathetic thing I could do in this situation would recommend you see a medical professional.

      2. Understood Douglas-do-right. If you murder the best hunter – the rest of the tribe starves. So murder is wrong because food. That’s your three month answer. Good.

        In that case – killing and eating the weaker “food” within the tribe could help the strongest hunter (and his lucky lady* friend) produce the next generation. This would also allow the greatest hunter some extra free time. Eating the weak is okay.

        *male hunter and lucky boyfriend would not be able to produce the next generation without the opposite sex

        This leads us back to the original question. Isn’t a murdered gay person simply unfit for survival? They can’t produce the next generation anyway.

        So if gay people are eating the food that could provide additional sustenance to those that can produce the next generation – is it okay to murder gay people?

        And no scientific evidence to prove that genocide is wrong. That’s embarrassing.

        Btw – it’s creepy that you haven’t denied wanting a rectum photo to “dispell (your) notion” that I have a carrot stuck in my rectum.

        ~CQW

        1. How is it possible to ‘kill the best hunter’ in a tribe without becoming ‘the best hunter’ yourself?

          Survival of the fittest is the jolly explanation for civilization’s advancement until NOW. Suddenly, oppressing the weak to benefit the strong is ‘evil’. Ironically, it’s the religious people who are cast as the worst perpetrators of this evil.

          Good answer, CQW. I’m surprised you could sit still long enough to write with a vegetable jammed in your posterior.

          http://i.giphy.com/1Moe2Us9pVV60.gif

      3. “Only an individual suffering from some type of mental
        disorder would even ask such a question, so the most empathetic thing I could do in this situation would recommend you see a medical professional.”

        Having no moral reason based in nature to suggest the contrary, wouldn’t it be more empathetic to go the George Bernard Shaw route and have him gassed?

  12. Wow. The leftist self righteous mind refuses logic and goes immediately to accusation, hyperbole, obfuscation and deception all within a framework of rudeness as they talk over those with whom they disagree. It’s childish and embarrassing to watch. How in the world have we allowed them to run media and education for so long?

Dive into the discussion...

Archives
Subscribe to Blog via Email

Get my blog in your inbox!

Follow

Get the latest posts delivered to your mailbox:

Your Cart