So there’s this.
Here’s the highlight:
The study’s most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
“This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could,” [a researcher] told AFP.
That reaction is understandable: How does one explain the fact that 90 percent of animal life, genetically speaking, is roughly the same age?
So much for millions and millions and millions of years of gradual change.
That sucks for you Darwinian evolution fans.
Cheer up, though.
You can still admire Darwin for his sweet beard.
Don’t you just LOVE science?
I do!
The one thing we share with atheists is a love of science.
Right, Neil?
Keep the faith!
In the meantime, you better have a word with your geneticist buddies.
Tell them to slow down.
At the rate they’re going, they might discover the Earth formed in a week.
5 Responses
Fantastic post!
I remember getting blasted by one of your atheist posters for my comment about the soft tissue being discovered in dinosaur bones. Atheists don’t like any truth or discovery that messes with their Darwinian Devotion and Dogma.
When you discover Absolute Truth, Science is part of it and always honestly points back to the Author, and will never refute Him. You just have to make certain the interpretation of the data is uncorrupted by inherent blindness, predjudice or agendas of researchers or sponsors. The experiments have to be elegantly designed as well.
I always shake my head at the stupid (and cruel) experiment that someone did. He made a startling pronouncement that grasshoppers hear with their ears. His proof? He noticed grasshoppers jump at loud noises. He then removed their hind legs, and amazingly they no longer jumped at loud noises, proving to him that they could no longer hear.
(Riiiiight… I’m sure it didn’t have anything to do with no longer being able to jump. How do you call a wiener dog with no legs? Don’t bother.)
My apologies to Patrick: My finger was headed toward the like button on my phone screen, and I somehow touched the – vote and it wouldn’t let me correct my vote. 😢 Yours is a great, wry, understated comment, and I hope John can reset your likes to 2,000.
Correction: his pronouncement was that grasshoppers hear with their legs.
I need to stop posting using my tiny screen…😜
What is fun is reading the comments from those trying to quickly disprove the results of this study. I was expecting someone to accuse Ken Ham of planting the story. It seems it’s only scientific ignorance if it doesn’t fit their paradigm.
One of the suggestions in that article is that a worldwide catastrophe destroyed most life so it essentially started over. Would a worldwide flood fit the definition of such a catastrophe?